Development: Unlocking the microbiome
Living peacefully within or on the surface of every multicellular organism is a community of microbes, known as a microbiome, that benefits the health of the host. In the human gut, for instance, these microbes help develop the immune system, provide protection against pathogens, and break down food for nutrition (Horrocks et al., 2023). Although scientists have made great strides in deciphering how these health benefits are achieved, identifying which microbes are responsible remains a major challenge in the field, particularly in higher organisms such as humans.
An alternative is to study organisms that have less complex microbiomes, such as fruit flies. Previous work has shown that four bacterial families make up 90% of the bacteria in the fruit fly microbiome, and only 14 families account for the other 10% (Chandler et al., 2011). Yeast are also an important part of the microbiome. Similar to bacterial populations, the diversity of yeast is also limited, with a single genus making up 59% of the yeast species present (Chandler et al., 2012). In natural habitats, wild fruit flies feed on fruit that is broken down, or ‘fermented’, by bacteria and yeast, which are then ingested by the fruit fly, causing them to become part of the fly’s microbiome. This community of microbes has been shown to generate nutrients that are critical for larval development (Shin et al., 2011; Storelli et al., 2011; Broderick and Lemaitre, 2012). Now, in eLife, Yukako Hattori from Kyoto University and JST FOREST – including Ayumi Mure as first author – report how individual members of the microbiome associated with the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster contribute to larval development (Mure et al., 2023).
To identify which microbes are present during larval development, the team (who are based at various institutes in Japan) placed freshly peeled bananas near their homes to attract wild fruit flies to lay eggs on the food. They then collected samples from the bananas two and a half days (early-stage food) and four to five days (late-stage food) into the fermentation process. Mure et al. found that the yeast and bacterial species that dominated the food changed from the early- to late-stage (Figure 1A). Notably, this transition in dietary microbes occurred even when D. melanogaster larvae were not present, suggesting that the shift is likely caused by other factors such as interactions among the microbes.

Interactions between diet, microbes, and flies.
(A) Fruit flies consume fermenting fruits containing various bacteria and yeast, which, as a result, become part of the fly’s microbiome. Early on during fermentation (left), a specific type of yeast dominates the food (early yeast). As fermentation progresses (right), the composition shifts, and the number of early yeast cells decreases while the number of acetic acid bacteria (AAB) increases, together with other species of yeast (late yeast) and/or lactic acid bacteria (LAB). (B) Both acetic acid bacteria (green) and the early yeast species (pink) support larvae growth by producing two branched-chain amino acids (leucine and isoleucine) and other, unknown factors. Initially, the early yeast cells provide these amino acids. As fermentation progresses, the rising number of lactic acid bacteria (purple) and late yeast cells (brown) increases the growth of acetic acid bacteria, which take over generating the amino acids and other factors the larvae need to grow. Exactly how these nutrients are provided is still unclear, but may involve active secretion by live cells or passive release through cell death.
Image credit: Figure created using BioRender.com.
Next, Mure et al. set out to determine which of the microbes they had identified were involved in larval development. Various species of bacteria and yeast were isolated from the fermented food, and added individually or in combination to a sterile culture medium that is prepared with bananas. Larvae that were free from microbes were then introduced to the cultures to see how ingestion of the different microbial species affected the rate and timing of pupariation, which is when larvae stop crawling and surround themselves with a pupal case before undergoing metamorphosis. Larvae fed on the yeast species that dominated early fermentation (Hanseniaspora uvarum) exhibited high rates of pupariation, whereas the yeast species from the late-stage (Pichia kluyveri and Starmerella bacillaris) were unable to effectively promote larval growth.
Mure et al. also observed high levels of pupariation when the acetic acid bacterium Acetobacter orientalis from late-stage food was provided in combination with yeast or lactic acid bacteria. Further experiments suggested that A. orientalis needs other microbes in order to grow to a high enough level to support larval development (Figure 1B). Indeed, Mure et al. found that larvae fed a daily dose of A. orientalis were able to effectively pupariate even in the absence of other microbes.
To further understand how yeast support larval growth, Mure et al. investigated how species from early- and late-stage food impact pupariation when they have been killed with heat, causing their nutrients and metabolites to leak out. Surprisingly, they found that yeast from the late-stage, which had previously not supported larval growth, could now promote development when introduced into the banana-like culture medium. This suggests that all of the studied yeast strains produce nutrients and metabolites that support larval growth, but those generated by the non-supportive yeast are less accessible to the larvae.
Analyzing the metabolites present in different yeasts revealed significantly higher levels of the branched-chain amino acids isoleucine and leucine in cultures of supportive species. Although supplementing the banana-like culture with these amino acids improved larval development, the larvae could still not fully grow into adulthood. This suggests that other unidentified nutrients provided by the supportive yeasts must be playing a role.
More studies identifying which microbes are responsible for certain biological effects will be fundamental to truly understand the impact microbial communities have on host health. Furthermore, this work highlights the complexity of interactions that occur between microbes from the diet and the host microbiome. In the future, knowledge created by these studies could be used to manipulate the composition of microbiomes for specific benefits, ranging from improving human health to altering the behavior of pollinating insects.
References
-
Gut-associated microbes of Drosophila melanogasterGut Microbes 3:307–321.https://doi.org/10.4161/gmic.19896
-
Yeast communities of diverse Drosophila species: comparison of two symbiont groups in the same hostsApplied and Environmental Microbiology 78:7327–7336.https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01741-12
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2023, Ferreira and Antunes
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 669
- views
-
- 81
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Developmental Biology
Hair follicle development is initiated by reciprocal molecular interactions between the placode-forming epithelium and the underlying mesenchyme. Cell fate transformation in dermal fibroblasts generates a cell niche for placode induction by activation of signaling pathways WNT, EDA, and FGF in the epithelium. These successive paracrine epithelial signals initiate dermal condensation in the underlying mesenchyme. Although epithelial signaling from the placode to mesenchyme is better described, little is known about primary mesenchymal signals resulting in placode induction. Using genetic approach in mice, we show that Meis2 expression in cells derived from the neural crest is critical for whisker formation and also for branching of trigeminal nerves. While whisker formation is independent of the trigeminal sensory innervation, MEIS2 in mesenchymal dermal cells orchestrates the initial steps of epithelial placode formation and subsequent dermal condensation. MEIS2 regulates the expression of transcription factor Foxd1, which is typical of pre-dermal condensation. However, deletion of Foxd1 does not affect whisker development. Overall, our data suggest an early role of mesenchymal MEIS2 during whisker formation and provide evidence that whiskers can normally develop in the absence of sensory innervation or Foxd1 expression.
-
- Developmental Biology
Wing dimorphism is a common phenomenon that plays key roles in the environmental adaptation of aphid; however, the signal transduction in response to environmental cues and the regulation mechanism related to this event remain unknown. Adenosine (A) to inosine (I) RNA editing is a post-transcriptional modification that extends transcriptome variety without altering the genome, playing essential roles in numerous biological and physiological processes. Here, we present a chromosome-level genome assembly of the rose-grain aphid Metopolophium dirhodum by using PacBio long HiFi reads and Hi-C technology. The final genome assembly for M. dirhodum is 447.8 Mb, with 98.50% of the assembled sequences anchored to nine chromosomes. The contig and scaffold N50 values are 7.82 and 37.54 Mb, respectively. A total of 18,003 protein-coding genes were predicted, of which 92.05% were functionally annotated. In addition, 11,678 A-to-I RNA-editing sites were systematically identified based on this assembled M. dirhodum genome, and two synonymous A-to-I RNA-editing sites on CYP18A1 were closely associated with transgenerational wing dimorphism induced by crowding. One of these A-to-I RNA-editing sites may prevent the binding of miR-3036-5p to CYP18A1, thus elevating CYP18A1 expression, decreasing 20E titer, and finally regulating the wing dimorphism of offspring. Meanwhile, crowding can also inhibit miR-3036-5p expression and further increase CYP18A1 abundance, resulting in winged offspring. These findings support that A-to-I RNA editing is a dynamic mechanism in the regulation of transgenerational wing dimorphism in aphids and would advance our understanding of the roles of RNA editing in environmental adaptability and phenotypic plasticity.