Abstract

Heterogeneity of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) in pancreatic islets is physiologically important but poorly understood. Here, we utilize mouse islets to determine how microtubules affect secretion toward the vascular extracellular matrix at single cell and subcellular levels. Our data indicate that microtubule stability in the β-cell population is heterogenous, and that GSIS is suppressed in cells with highly stable microtubules. Consistently, microtubule hyper-stabilization prevents, and microtubule depolymerization promotes capacity of single β-cell for GSIS. Analysis of spatiotemporal patterns of secretion events shows that microtubule depolymerization activates otherwise dormant β-cells via initiation of secretion clusters (hot spots). Microtubule depolymerization also enhances secretion from individual cells, introducing both additional clusters and scattered events. Interestingly, without microtubules, the timing of clustered secretion is dysregulated, extending the first phase of GSIS and causing oversecretion. In contrast, glucose-induced Ca2+ influx was not affected by microtubule depolymerization yet required for secretion under these conditions, indicating that microtubule-dependent regulation of secretion hot spots acts in parallel with Ca2+ signaling. Our findings uncover a novel microtubule function in tuning insulin secretion hot spots, which leads to accurately measured and timed response to glucose stimuli and promotes functional β-cell heterogeneity.

Data availability

All numerical data generated during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for all figures. Code is provided for computational data.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kathryn P Trogden

    Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3288-3859
  2. Justin S Lee

    Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kai M Bracey

    Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Kung-Hsien Ho

    Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Hudson McKinney

    Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Xiaodong Zhu

    Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Goker Arpag

    Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6893-2678
  8. Thomas G Folland

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Anna B Osipovich

    Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Mark A Magnusson

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Marija Zanic

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5127-5819
  12. Guoqiang Gu

    Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. William R Holmes

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Irina Kaverina

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    For correspondence
    irina.kaverina@vanderbilt.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4002-8599

Funding

National Institutes of Health (T32 DK07061)

  • Kathryn P Trogden

National Institutes of Health (1F32DK117529)

  • Kathryn P Trogden

National Institutes of Health (R35-GM127098)

  • Irina Kaverina

National Institutes of Health (R01-DK65949)

  • Guoqiang Gu

National Institutes of Health (DMS1562078)

  • William R Holmes

National Institutes of Health (R01-DK106228)

  • Guoqiang Gu
  • William R Holmes
  • Irina Kaverina

National Institutes of Health (R35-GM119552)

  • Marija Zanic

National Institutes of Health (F31 DK122650)

  • Kai M Bracey

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (protocol M1500060-00) of Vanderbilt University.

Copyright

© 2021, Trogden et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,533
    views
  • 352
    downloads
  • 18
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kathryn P Trogden
  2. Justin S Lee
  3. Kai M Bracey
  4. Kung-Hsien Ho
  5. Hudson McKinney
  6. Xiaodong Zhu
  7. Goker Arpag
  8. Thomas G Folland
  9. Anna B Osipovich
  10. Mark A Magnusson
  11. Marija Zanic
  12. Guoqiang Gu
  13. William R Holmes
  14. Irina Kaverina
(2021)
Microtubules regulate pancreatic β cell heterogeneity via spatiotemporal control of insulin secretion hot spots
eLife 10:e59912.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59912

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59912

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Paul Richard J Yulo, Nicolas Desprat ... Heather L Hendrickson
    Research Article

    Maintenance of rod-shape in bacterial cells depends on the actin-like protein MreB. Deletion of mreB from Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 results in viable spherical cells of variable volume and reduced fitness. Using a combination of time-resolved microscopy and biochemical assay of peptidoglycan synthesis, we show that reduced fitness is a consequence of perturbed cell size homeostasis that arises primarily from differential growth of daughter cells. A 1000-generation selection experiment resulted in rapid restoration of fitness with derived cells retaining spherical shape. Mutations in the peptidoglycan synthesis protein Pbp1A were identified as the main route for evolutionary rescue with genetic reconstructions demonstrating causality. Compensatory pbp1A mutations that targeted transpeptidase activity enhanced homogeneity of cell wall synthesis on lateral surfaces and restored cell size homeostasis. Mechanistic explanations require enhanced understanding of why deletion of mreB causes heterogeneity in cell wall synthesis. We conclude by presenting two testable hypotheses, one of which posits that heterogeneity stems from non-functional cell wall synthesis machinery, while the second posits that the machinery is functional, albeit stalled. Overall, our data provide support for the second hypothesis and draw attention to the importance of balance between transpeptidase and glycosyltransferase functions of peptidoglycan building enzymes for cell shape determination.

    1. Cell Biology
    Kaima Tsukada, Rikiya Imamura ... Mikio Shimada
    Research Article

    Polynucleotide kinase phosphatase (PNKP) has enzymatic activities as 3′-phosphatase and 5′-kinase of DNA ends to promote DNA ligation and repair. Here, we show that cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) regulate the phosphorylation of threonine 118 (T118) in PNKP. This phosphorylation allows recruitment to the gapped DNA structure found in single-strand DNA (ssDNA) nicks and/or gaps between Okazaki fragments (OFs) during DNA replication. T118A (alanine)-substituted PNKP-expressing cells exhibited an accumulation of ssDNA gaps in S phase and accelerated replication fork progression. Furthermore, PNKP is involved in poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1)-dependent replication gap filling as part of a backup pathway in the absence of OFs ligation. Altogether, our data suggest that CDK-mediated PNKP phosphorylation at T118 is important for its recruitment to ssDNA gaps to proceed with OFs ligation and its backup repairs via the gap-filling pathway to maintain genome stability.