Abstract

The hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is activated in response to inflammation leading to increased production of anti-inflammatory glucocorticoids by the adrenal cortex, thereby representing an endogenous feedback loop. However, severe inflammation reduces the responsiveness of the adrenal gland to adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), although the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Here, we show by transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic analyses that LPS-induced systemic inflammation triggers profound metabolic changes in steroidogenic adrenocortical cells, including downregulation of the TCA cycle and oxidative phosphorylation, in mice. Inflammation disrupts the TCA cycle at the level of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), leading to succinate accumulation and disturbed steroidogenesis. Mechanistically, IL-1β reduces SDHB expression through upregulation of DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) and methylation of the SDHB promoter. Consequently, increased succinate levels impair oxidative phosphorylation and ATP synthesis and enhance ROS production, leading to reduced steroidogenesis. Together, we demonstrate that the IL-1β-DNMT1-SDHB-succinate axis disrupts steroidogenesis. Our findings not only provide a mechanistic explanation for the adrenal dysfunction in severe inflammation, but also offer a potential target for therapeutic intervention.

Data availability

RNA-Seq data are available in: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE200220.The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository, with the dataset identifier PXD036542. Once the article is accepted, data will be made public and accessible.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ivona Mateska

    Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    For correspondence
    Ivona.Mateska@uniklinikum-dresden.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6150-9175
  2. Anke Witt

    Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Eman Hagag

    Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Anupam Sinha

    Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Canelif Yilmaz

    Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9676-9310
  6. Evangelia Thanou

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6843-4591
  7. Na Sun

    Research Unit Analytical Pathology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Ourania Kolliniati

    Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Maria Patschin

    Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Heba Abdelmegeed

    Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Holger Henneicke

    enter for Regenerative Therapies, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Waldemar Kanczkowski

    Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Ben Wielockx

    Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Christos Tsatsanis

    Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Andreas Dahl

    Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2668-8371
  16. Axel Karl Walch

    Research Unit Analytical Pathology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Ka Wan Li

    Center of Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6983-5055
  18. Mirko Peitzsch

    Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2472-675X
  19. Triantafyllos Chavakis

    Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Vasileia Ismini Alexaki

    Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    For correspondence
    VasileiaIsmini.Alexaki@uniklinikum-dresden.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3935-8985

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB/TRR205)

  • Ben Wielockx
  • Mirko Peitzsch
  • Vasileia Ismini Alexaki

HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme (Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 765704)

  • Vasileia Ismini Alexaki

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: The animal experiments were approved by the Landesdirektion Sachsen Germany (protocol number TVV57/2018).

Copyright

© 2023, Mateska et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,040
    views
  • 210
    downloads
  • 7
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ivona Mateska
  2. Anke Witt
  3. Eman Hagag
  4. Anupam Sinha
  5. Canelif Yilmaz
  6. Evangelia Thanou
  7. Na Sun
  8. Ourania Kolliniati
  9. Maria Patschin
  10. Heba Abdelmegeed
  11. Holger Henneicke
  12. Waldemar Kanczkowski
  13. Ben Wielockx
  14. Christos Tsatsanis
  15. Andreas Dahl
  16. Axel Karl Walch
  17. Ka Wan Li
  18. Mirko Peitzsch
  19. Triantafyllos Chavakis
  20. Vasileia Ismini Alexaki
(2023)
Succinate mediates inflammation-induced adrenocortical dysfunction
eLife 12:e83064.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83064

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83064

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Sofía Suárez Freire, Sebastián Perez-Pandolfo ... Mariana Melani
    Research Article

    Eukaryotic cells depend on exocytosis to direct intracellularly synthesized material toward the extracellular space or the plasma membrane, so exocytosis constitutes a basic function for cellular homeostasis and communication between cells. The secretory pathway includes biogenesis of secretory granules (SGs), their maturation and fusion with the plasma membrane (exocytosis), resulting in release of SG content to the extracellular space. The larval salivary gland of Drosophila melanogaster is an excellent model for studying exocytosis. This gland synthesizes mucins that are packaged in SGs that sprout from the trans-Golgi network and then undergo a maturation process that involves homotypic fusion, condensation, and acidification. Finally, mature SGs are directed to the apical domain of the plasma membrane with which they fuse, releasing their content into the gland lumen. The exocyst is a hetero-octameric complex that participates in tethering of vesicles to the plasma membrane during constitutive exocytosis. By precise temperature-dependent gradual activation of the Gal4-UAS expression system, we have induced different levels of silencing of exocyst complex subunits, and identified three temporarily distinctive steps of the regulated exocytic pathway where the exocyst is critically required: SG biogenesis, SG maturation, and SG exocytosis. Our results shed light on previously unidentified functions of the exocyst along the exocytic pathway. We propose that the exocyst acts as a general tethering factor in various steps of this cellular process.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Heungjin Ryu, Kibum Nam ... Jung-Hoon Park
    Research Article

    In most murine species, spermatozoa exhibit a falciform apical hook at the head end. The function of the sperm hook is not yet clearly understood. In this study, we investigate the role of the sperm hook in the migration of spermatozoa through the female reproductive tract in Mus musculus (C57BL/6), using a deep tissue imaging custom-built two-photon microscope. Through live reproductive tract imaging, we found evidence indicating that the sperm hook aids in the attachment of spermatozoa to the epithelium and facilitates interactions between spermatozoa and the epithelium during migration in the uterus and oviduct. We also observed synchronized sperm beating, which resulted from the spontaneous unidirectional rearrangement of spermatozoa in the uterus. Based on live imaging of spermatozoa-epithelium interaction dynamics, we propose that the sperm hook plays a crucial role in successful migration through the female reproductive tract by providing anchor-like mechanical support and facilitating interactions between spermatozoa and the female reproductive tract in the house mouse.